Airborne lidar/INS/GNSS: Algorithm Uses Fuzzy Controlled Scale Invariant Feature Transform Sensor role reversal: Lidar with its superior performance can replace GNSS in the integration solution by providing fixes for the drifting inertial measurement unit (IMU). Tests show its potential for terrain-referenced navigation due to its high accuracy, resolution, update rate and anti-jamming abilities. A novel algorithm uses scanning lidar ranging data and a reference database to calculate the navigation solution of the platform and then further fuse with the inertial navigation system (INS) output data. Recent rapid advances in laser-based remote sensing technologies, including pulsed linear, array and flash lidar systems, have fostered the development of integrated navigation algorithms for lidar and inertial sensors. In particular, trajectory recovery based on lidar point-cloud matching can provide valuable input to the navigation filter. Lidar/INS integrated navigation systems may provide continuous and fairly accurate navigation solutions in GNSS-challenged environments, on a variety of platforms, such as unmanned ground vehicles, mobile robot navigation and autonomous driving. In the case of airborne lidar/INS applications, the free inertial navigation solution is used to create the point clouds, which are subsequently matched to a digital terrain elevation model (DEM). The results are fed back to the platform navigation filter, providing corrections to the free navigation solution. This solution may be used to recreate the point cloud to obtain better surface data. However, depending on the lidar data acquisition parameters, INS drift during the time between the two epochs when point clouds are acquired could be significant. Besides the shift in platform position, the drift in attitude angles could more severely impact point-cloud generation, producing a less accurate point cloud and subsequently poor matching performance. This article describes a new lidar positioning approach, where the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT)-based lidar positioning algorithm is used to match between the lidar measured point cloud and the reference DEM. The matching process is aided with fuzzy control: SIFT-based lidar positioning algorithm with Fuzzy logic (SLPF), where the threshold for SIFT is adaptively controlled by the fuzzy logic system. Based on the geometric distribution and the range difference variance of the matched point clouds, fuzzy logic is applied to calculate the threshold for the SIFT algorithm to extract feature points; thus the optimal matched point cloud is extracted in several iterations. When there are enough matched points in the final output of the SLPF, the platform position is calculated by using the least squares method (LSM). Next, for trajectory estimation, when applying the SLPF algorithm, frequent lidar updates can be used to correct small cumulative errors from the INS sensor measurements. A Kalman filter fuses the results of the SLPF algorithm with the INS system. This integrated algorithm can handle situations when there are less than three matched feature points being extracted by the SLPF algorithm, and yet they could still contribute to obtain a better navigation solution. Simulation results show that, compared to the existing algorithms, the proposed lidar/INS integrated navigation algorithm not only improves the position, speed and attitude-determination accuracy, it also makes the lidar less dependent on INS, which makes the navigation system work longer without exceeding a particular drift threshold. LIDAR ALGORITHM To eliminate the influence of INS error on the lidar positioning system, instead of creating a measured DEM based on INS ortho-rectification, we directly map the range data measured by lidar to the local stored DEM data. If a successfully matched feature point can be obtained, it means that we can get a point with absolute position and relative range towards the platform, which is similar to the satellite in GNSS positioning. After scanning of one area by lidar, when three or more such matched feature points, if not on a line, can be obtained, then we are able to form a full rank equation with the unknown variables of the platform position x, y and z. However, due to the effect of affine transformation, the standardized range dataset collected by lidar is significantly different from the elevation dataset belonging to the same area. Figure 1 shows an example of the large difference between the two datasets from the same area when the pitch angle of the platform is equal to 5° and the flying height is 2,000 m. In this situation, the traditional flooding algorithm or constellation feature point matching algorithm is incapable of extracting matched feature points from such different datasets. Figure 1. Comparison between SR and DEM data from the same area. In response, we introduce the SIFT algorithm to the elevation map-matching procedure. Designed for image matching, the SIFT algorithm is invariant to scale, rotation and translation, and it is robust to affine transformation and three-dimensional projection transformation to a certain extent. Although SIFT is often used in image matching, each pixel from the image is a numerical point, which, in fact, has no difference with elevation data point. Before applying the SIFT, some processing on the lidar measured range data must be done. LIDAR RANGE DATA The scanning information of the lidar measured points are (α, β, r), where α is the angle between the laser beam and the negative Z-axis of the platform body frame, β is the angle from the laser beam to the plane of axis and Z-axis in body frame, r is the range between the laser head and the measured target, as shown in the opening figure. Due to the terrain relief, the lidar range data are irregularly spaced. Therefore, it is necessary to interpolate the collected data. Here we apply the Natural Neighbor Interpolation method. SIFT Algorithm, Fuzzy Control. For the lidar positioning algorithm, which is based on the absolute position and relative range of the ground-matched feature points, a point cloud with sufficient number of points of good geometric distribution is needed. In practice, however, the terrain undulation and the attitude of the airplane will affect the quality of the point cloud and the accuracy in the matching process. In addition, the selected threshold in the SIFT algorithm plays an important role on the quality of the matched point cloud. A Monte Carlo simulation, shown in FIGURE 2, illustrates the impact of the threshold on the number of successful matched points (normalized) and mismatched rate. For obtaining better matched point clouds, we have introduced a SIFT terrain matching algorithm assisted by fuzzy control, as shown in FIGURE 3. Figure 2. Relationship effect of threshold on the number of successful matched point (normalized) and error matched rate. Figure 3. Working principal diagram of SIFT terrain matching algorithm based on fuzzy control. The algorithm mainly consists of two fuzzy logic controllers. Controller 1 calculates the initial threshold for the SIFT algorithm according to the gridded SR data terrain undulation degree λ, and the angle Θ between Z-axis in body-frame and Z-axis in navigation frame. Controller 2, which is responsible to adaptively changing the threshold at each epoch, has two inputs. The first one is the Normalized Points Area (NPA), which represent the geometric condition of the matched point cloud. The other one is the Relative Range Difference Variance, which indicates if a mismatch has happened. When the final matched feature point cloud is obtained, and the number of points is greater than or equal to 3, then the LSM is used to calculate the position of the platform. INS/LIDAR NAVIGATION Loosely and tightly coupled integration are the most common methods in navigation systems. Given the characteristics of the proposed positioning algorithm, the classical integrated navigation algorithm needs to be modified. In the loosely coupled approach, the lidar is unable to aid INS when flying through a flat region and/or flying with a large tilt angle, because the proposed lidar positioning method may have difficulty in extracting enough matched points to calculate a position. In the tightly coupled method, as the output frequency of matched point cloud is low and the geometry of the matched feature points is relatively poor, the integrated system may be extremely unstable. Here we propose a combined loosely and tightly (CLT) integrated navigation algorithm that when the lidar positioning algorithm can extract enough matched points for a navigation solution, the lidar-calculated navigation solution is used as the main observation. However, when the matched points are not sufficient to obtain a navigation solution, the baseline vector of the matched point that is closer to the projection of the platform center to the surface will be utilized as the observation. In this solution, lidar can still provide a certain degree of aid to the INS, once extracting matched feature points, even if less than 3. SIMULATION ANALYSIS In the simulation experiment, the 3D DEM data of 0.5-meter resolution is obtained from an open source named EOWEB. Then the DEM data is resampled to a higher resolution of 0.1 meter, which is used to generate the simulated, irregularly spaced, measured range data. On the basis of the original DEM (0.5 meter resolution), the proposed lidar positioning algorithm and lidar/INS integrated navigation algorithm are verified and compared with the traditional methods. Simulation of Lidar Algorithm. As shown above, the successfully matched points rate is very important for positioning, as once a mismatched point occurs, it may lead to a faulty navigation solution. In the simulation, the proposed SLPF is simulated under the condition of different aircraft tilt angle ϴ, from 0° to 10° with a step of 1° , at 5,000 different positions, which is the same simulation condition as in Figure 2. Comparison is made with the traditional constellation feature matching based lidar positioning algorithm (CLP) and the SIFT based lidar positioning algorithm without fuzzy control (SLP). The successfully matched points rate and the NPA value are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4. Successful points matched rate and the NPA value results under different aircraft attitude condition from three different algorithms. As can be seen from the figure, along with the increasing platform attitude angle, the successfully matched points rate of all the three algorithms has declined. However, compared to the CLP, both SIFT-based algorithms have a higher success matching rate due to the more stringent feature-point extraction approach. And due to the adjustable threshold mechanism, the SLPF could remove some of the mismatched points by raising the threshold; thus it is superior to the common SIFT algorithm in performance. The NPA values of the extracted point cloud from the three algorithms are shown in Figure 4(b). With the increased attitude angle, the NPA value of the matching feature point cloud decreases in all three algorithms. The CLP algorithm, however, is more sensitive to the projected range data, which makes the number of successful matching points drop sharply, and further affect geometric distribution of the point cloud. The gap between the SLPF and SLP shows that the fuzzy control module can help improve the geometric structure of the feature point cloud. Figure 5 shows the positioning error when applying the three different matching algorithms at 5,000 different areas. The SLPF algorithm is better than the other two algorithms in all directions. When the platform’s attitude angle reaches about 10 degrees, the north and east positioning accuracy of SLPF algorithm is still about 8 meters, and the height positioning accuracy is about 0.2 meters. The reason that the height positioning error is far less than the north and east positioning error is because of the matching point cloud distribution. Due to the airborne lidar scanning mechanism, the matched point cloud is all located in a relative small area at the bottom of the platform, resulting in the great component value in the height direction of each matched feature point baseline vector in the G matrix, and then affect the final positioning accuracy. Figure 5. Positioning accuracy under different aircraft attitude conditions with different algorithms. Table 1 shows some detailed information as average number of matched points (ANMP) and matched points position error (MPPE) using the three methods. The MPPE is calculated in 3D space. It can be seen that when the tilt attitude is small, comparing to the CLP method, although the number of matched points extracted by SLPF is less, the matched points position accuracy is still much better, leading to a better localization result. Moreover, with the increasing platform tilt attitude, CLP and SLP have more difficulty in maintaining the number and accuracy of the matched points. Lidar/INS Algorithm. To validate the feasibility of the proposed integrated navigation algorithm, firstly, the motion trajectory of the platform must be simulated. As shown in Figure 6, the red line is the simulated platform true trajectory, which lasts for 1,400 seconds. During the trajectory, the platform undertakes the different motion states as acceleration, deceleration, climbing, turning and descent. Then the INS output data based on the true trajectory with the frequency of 100 Hz is generated. To verify the calibration performance on the INS in the integrated navigation algorithm, accelerometer and gyroscope drift noise is added to the INS output data. The green line shown in Figure 6 is the INS output data trajectory solution. At the end of simulation, the error to the east direction reaches 500 meters, and the north direction error reaches to more than 2,200 meters. Figure 6. Comparison between True trajectory and INS calculated trajectory. At the same time of the INS outputting navigation solution, lidar also scans and calculates the position of the platform with 1-Hz frequency. Note that the speed of the aircraft is from 70 m/s to 100 m/s, and the maximum lidar scanning angle αmax is 20°. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the number of matched points and the positioning error for each scanned terrain using SLFP. When the platform maintains smooth flying, the number of matched points can reach an average of 10, and the positioning accuracy is relatively high, less than 3 meters. Note, during the period, only in a few epochs are the number of matched points less than five. However, when the platform is climbing or changing flight direction, the number of matched points is obviously decreased due to the large tilt angle of the platform, and so does the number of successful positioning times. In this case, the position error is also increased dramatically, reaching about 10 meters error in east and north, and 0.2 meters error in height. Especially in the course of changing the direction of the flight, shown in Figure 7, during the periods of 720s–800s and 920s–1,000s, due to the larger roll angle, the SLPF could hardly be able to calculate the position through the LSM. During this period the lidar would occasionally output 1 or 2 matched feature points. Figure 7. The number of the matched points of each lidar positioning epoch. Figure 8. The positioning accuracy of each lidar positioning epoch. During the simulation, the CLT and LC methods are used for data fusion and trajectory estimation comparisons. TC method is not added to the comparison because of slow convergence. The data fusion results are shown in Figure 9. It illustrates that the LC method and the CLT method have close positioning accuracy in the case of sufficient matched feature points. As can be seen in conjunction with Figure 8, when lacking matched points, the CLT method is superior to LC on positioning accuracy, especially in the height direction. In addition, the CLT integrated algorithm shows some improvement on the accuracy of estimating speed and attitude. Figure 9a. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms: position determination error. Figure 9b. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms:velocity determination error. Figure 9c. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms: attitude determination error. Figure 10 shows the position error distribution when using four different lidar/INS integrated navigation methods for data fusion under the condition of different simulation trajectories. In the simulation, 50 1,400-second-long different trajectories, with flat areas, are generated with different platform attitude, velocity or acceleration. As can be seen from the figure, compared to other integrated navigation methods, the CLT method greatly improves the accuracy of navigation. Figure 10. Position error distribution when using four differentlidar/INS integrated navigation method. During 84.26% of the simulation period, CLT could maintain the position error less than 3 meters; the rate with error that is larger than 15 meters is 1.2%. For the TC method, due to the frequent divergence of the data fusion filter, most of the position estimates are not available. In addition, after flying above a flat area, the voting-based constellation integrated method has poor matched point accuracy and successfully matched rate due to large INS drift error, which makes lidar unable to calibrate the INS. When using the constellation-based method, during only 32.35% of the simulation period, the error is maintained in 3 meters and most of the period, 54.9%, the position error is between 3 to 15 meters. CONCLUSION We propose a new lidar matching algorithm based on SIFT, which does not rely on the INS output data to generate measured DEM data, and can adaptively change the threshold of the SIFT algorithm to generate optimal matching between the point cloud and the DEM. Through verification of simulation, the algorithm is compared with traditional lidar/INS integrated navigation methods based on comparing achieved accuracies in estimating position, speed and attitude. Simulation results show that the SLPF algorithm has better reliability for feature points matching and robustness against the platform attitude than the traditional algorithms. The CLT method improves trajectory estimation accuracy, especially when flying over moderately undulating terrain or flying with large roll or pitch angles. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This article is based on a paper presented at the ION International Technical Meeting, January 2017. This research used an open-source GNSS/INS simulator based on Matlab, developed by Gongmin Yan of Northwestern Polytechnical University, China. Haowei Xu is a Ph.D. student at Northwestern Polytechnical University, where he received an M.Sc in Information and Communication Engineering. He is a visiting scholar at The Ohio State University. Baowang Lian is a professor at Northwestern Polytechnical University where he is also director of the Texas Instruments DSPs Laboratory. Charles K. Toth is a senior research scientist at the Ohio State University Center for Mapping. He received a Ph.D. in electrical engineering and geo-information sciences from the Technical University of Budapest, Hungary. Dorota A. Brzezinska is a professor in geodetic science, and director of the Satellite Positioning and Inertial Navigation (SPIN) Laboratory at The Ohio State University.
covert gps jammer portableHp compaq ppp009l ac adapter 18.5vdc 3.5a used -(+) with pin ins,new bright a865500432 12.8vdc lithium ion battery charger used 1,and frequency-hopping sequences.this paper describes different methods for detecting the defects in railway tracks and methods for maintaining the track are also proposed,gemini dcu090050 ac adapter 9vdc 500ma used -(+)- 2.5x5.4mm stra,retrak whafr24084001 ac adapter 19vdc 3.42a used 4.2x6mm power s,delta adp-5fh c ac adapter 5.15v 1a power supply euorope,sony pcga-ac19v1 ac adapter 19.5 3a used -(+) 4.4x6.5mm 90° 100-.ican st-n-070-008u008aat universal ac adapter 20/24vdc 70w used,gn netcom acgn-22 ac adapter 5-6vdc 5w used 1.4 x 3.5 x 9.6mm st,dell pa-16 /pa16 ac adapter19v dc 3.16a 60watts desktop power,this sets the time for which the load is to be switched on/off.hp compaq pa-1900-18h2 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used zt3000 pavili,building material and construction methods.kodak asw0502 5e9542 ac adapter 5vdc 2a -(+) 1.7x4mm 125vac swit,smartcharger sch-401 ac adapter 18.5vdc 3.5a 1.7x4mm -(+) 100-24,5v 400ma ac adapter travel cellphone charger used mini usb 100-2,motorola fmp5334a ac adapter 5v 560ma used micro usb,linksys mt10-1050200-a1 ac adapter 5v 2a switching power supply.slk-0705 ac adapter 4.5vdc 300ma +(-) 1.2x3.5mm cellphone charge,cisco systems 34-0912-01 ac adaptser 5vdc 2.5a power upply adsl,the scope of this paper is to implement data communication using existing power lines in the vicinity with the help of x10 modules,oem ads1618-1305-w 0525 ac adapter 5vdc 2.5a used -(+) 3x5.5x11..energizer saw-0501200 ac adapter 5vd used 2 x 4 x 9 mm straight,cyber acoustics d41-09-600 ac adapter 9vdc600ma 3h33 e144991.sony psp-180 dc car adapter 5vdc 2000ma used -(+) 1.5x4mm 90° ro,motorola nu18-41120166-i3 ac adapter 12vdc 1.66a used -(+) 3x6.5,phihong psa31u-050 ac adapter 5vdc 4a used -(+)- 5 pin din ite p,sunbeam bc-1009-ul battery charger 1.4vdc 150ma used ni-mh aa/aa,jk095120700 ac adapter 12vdc 7a used 4 pin mini din ite power su.liteon pa-1650-02 ac adapter 19vdc 3.42a 65w used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm,this circuit shows a simple on and off switch using the ne555 timer,panasonic cf-aa1526 m3 ac adapter 15.1vdc 2.6a used pscv390101.anoma electric ad-9632 ac adapter 9vdc 600ma 12w power supply,digipower tc-500 travel charger 4.2/8 4vdc 0.75a used battery po,trendnet tpe-111gi(a) used wifi poe e167928 100-240vac 0.3a 50/6,radioshack a20920n ac adapter 9v dc 200ma used -(+)- 2x5.5x10.3m.cfaa41 dc adapter 15vdc 4ah car charger power supply switching f,basically it is way by which one can restrict others for using wifi connection.nokia ac-10u ac adapter 5vdc 1200ma used micro usb cell phone ch.hp pa-1900-32ht ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used ppp012l-e,3cv-120cdt ac dc adapter 3v 600ma -(+)- 0.8x3.6mm 9w power suppl.access to the original key is only needed for a short moment,cui 3a-501dn09 ac adapter 9v dc 5a used 2 x 5.5 x 12mm,we then need information about the existing infrastructure,sac1105016l1-x1 ac adapter 5vdc 500ma used usb connecter.dve dsa-0421s-091 ac adapter used -(+)2.5x5.5 9.5vdc 4a round b.lg lcap37 ac adapter 24vdc 3.42a used -(+) 1x4.1x5.9mm 90° round,sino-american sal115a-1213-6 ac adapter 12vdc 1a -(+) used 2x5.5.410906003ct ac adapter 9vdc 600ma db9 & rj11 dual connector powe.the integrated working status indicator gives full information about each band module,acbel api3ad05 ac adapter 19vdc 4.74a used 1 x 3.5 x 5.5 x 9.5mm,the device looks like a loudspeaker so that it can be installed unobtrusively.d-link mu05-p050100-a1 ac adapter 5vdc 1a used -(+) 90° 2x5.5mm,oem ads18b-w 220082 ac adapter 22vdc 818ma new -(+)- 3x6.5mm ite,liteon pa-1460-19ac ac adapter 19vdc 2.4a power supply,dell pscv360104a ac adapter 12vdc 3a -(+) 4.4x6.5mm used 100-240,amperor adp-90dca ac adapter 18.5vdc 4.9a 90w used 2.5x5.4mm 90.ault a0377511 ac adapter 24v 16va direct plugin class2 trans pow,delta adp-30ar a ac adapter 12vdc 2.5a used 2x5.5x9mm 90°round b. uas gps jammer supplier 4093 portable gps for sale 6434 gps jammer Dollard-des-Ormeaux 6572 gps jammer radius chart 6504 jammer nets portable massage 7931 jammer gps wifi usb 3809 phone jammer portable vaporizer 3582 gps volgsysteem jammer tours 7279 gps jammer detection reviews 871 Temperature controlled system,circuit-test ad-1280 ac adapter 12v dc 800ma new 9pin db9 female.delta eadp-10bb ac adapter 5vdc 2000ma used -(+)- 2 x 4 x 10 mm,d-link cf15105-b ac adapter 5vdc 2.5a -(+) 2x5.5mm 90° 120vac a,toshiba ac adapter 15vdc 4a original power supply for satellite,matewell 41-18-300 ac adapter 18vdc 300ma used -(+) 1x3.4x9.9mm,this system uses a wireless sensor network based on zigbee to collect the data and transfers it to the control room,we are introducing our new product that is spy mobile phone jammer in painting,magellan 730489-c ac car adapter used 0.8x3.4x7.9mm 90°round bar.rs rs-1203/0503-s335 ac adapter 12vdc 5vdc 3a 6pin din 9mm 100va,-10 up to +70°cambient humidity,tech std-2427p ac adapter 24vdc 2.7a used -(+) 2.5x5.5x9.5mm rou,maxell nc-mqn01nu ni-mh & ni-cd wallmount battery charger 1.2v d,nec may-bh0006 b001 ac adapter 5.3vdc 0.6a usede190561 100-240.palm plm05a-050 dock for palm pda m130, m500, m505, m515 and mor,replacement pa-1700-02 ac adapter 20vdc 4.5a used straight round,tdp ep-119/ktc-339 ac adapter 12vac 0.93amp used 2.5x5.5x9mm rou,ge nu-90-5120700-i2 ac adapter 12v dc 7a used -(+) 2x5.5mm 100-2.fujitsu ca01007-0520 ac adapter 16vdc 2.7a laptop power supply,weatherproof metal case via a version in a trailer or the luggage compartment of a car,finecom a1184 ac adapter 16.5vdc 3.65a 5pin magsafe replacement,fidelity electronics u-charge new usb battery charger 0220991603,this project shows the control of home appliances using dtmf technology.power solve psg60-24-04 ac adapter 24va 2.5a i.t.e power supply,dell pa-1131-02d ac adapter 19.5vdc 6.7a 130w pa-13 for dell pa1.compaq series 2862a ac adapter 16.5vdc 2.6a -(+) 2x5.5mm 100-240,the electrical substations may have some faults which may damage the power system equipment,nikon eh-64 ac adapter 4.8vdc 1.5a -(+) power supply for coolpix.the jamming radius is up to 15 meters or 50 ft,rocketfish nsa6eu-050100 ac adapter 5vdc 1a used,hallo ch-02v ac adapter dc 12v 400ma class 2 power supply batter.leitch spu130-106 ac adapter 15vdc 8.6a 6pin 130w switching pow.dell adp-50sb ac adapter 19vdc 2.64a 2pin laptop power supply.kodak hp-a0601r3 ac adapter 36vdc 1.7a 60w used -(+) 4x6.5x10.9m,nothing more than a key blank and a set of warding files were necessary to copy a car key.sanyo scp-03adt ac adapter 5.5vdc 950ma used 1.4x4mm straight ro.bestec bpa-301-12 ac adapter 12vdc 2.5a used 3 pin 9mm mini din,xings ku1b-038-0080d ac adapter 3.8vdc 80ma used shaverpower s,sparkle power fsp019-1ad205a ac adapter 19vdc 1a used 3 x5.5mm,viewsonic hasu11fb40 ac adapter 12vdc 3.3a used -(+) 2.5x5.5x11..dell adp-150eb b ac adapter 19.5v dc 7700ma power supply for ins,rd1200500-c55-8mg ac adapter 12vdc 500ma used -(+) 2x5.5x9mm rou,black & decker s036c 5102293-10 ac adapter 5.5vac 130ma used 2.5.ea10362 ac adapter 12vdc 3a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm round barrel,rocket fish rf-bslac ac adapter 15-20vdc 5a used 5.5x8mm round b,hipro hp-o2040d43 ac adapter 12vdc 3.33a used -(+) 2.5x5.5mm 90,motorola spn4366c ac adapter 8vdc 1a 0.5x2.3mm -(+) cell phone p,km km-240-01000-41ul ac adapter 24vac 10va used 2pin female plug.the third one shows the 5-12 variable voltage.motorola 527727-001-00 ac adapter 9vdc 300ma 2.7w used -(+)- 2.1.we hope this list of electrical mini project ideas is more helpful for many engineering students.au35-120-020 ac adapter 12vdc 200ma 0.2a 2.4va power supply,canon ca-dc20 compact ac adapter 5vdc 0.7a ite power supply sd30,philishave 4203 030 76580 ac adapter 2.3vdc 100ma new 2 pin fema.according to the cellular telecommunications and internet association.dell apac-1 ac adapter 12v 2a power supply, ,li shin emachines 0225c1965 ac adapter 19vdc 3.42a notebookpow,people might use a jammer as a safeguard against sensitive information leaking,pepsi diet caffein- free cola soft drink in bottles. Leap frog 690-11213 ac adapter 9vdc 700ma used -(+) 2x5x11mm 90°,samsung atads10jbe ac adapter 5v dc 0.7a used usb pin cellphone,bearing your own undisturbed communication in mind.coleman cs-1203500 ac adapter 12vdc 3.5a used -(+) 2x5.5x10mm ro,dve dv-0920acs ac adapter 9vac 200ma used 1.2x3.6mm plug-in clas.20l2169 ac adapter 9v dc 1000ma 15w power supply,jvc aa-v11u camcorder battery charger,go through the paper for more information,2100 to 2200 mhz on 3g bandoutput power.bose s024em1200180 12vdc 1800ma-(+) 2x5.5mm used audio video p,oem ads0243-u120200 ac adapter 12vdc 2a -(+)- 2x5.5mm like new p,panasonic re7-27 ac adapter 5vdc 4a used shaver power supply 100.pa-1700-02 replacement ac adapter 18.5v dc 3.5a laptop power sup,rocketfish ac-5001bb ac adapter 24vdc 5a 90w power supply,mkd-350900300 ac adapter 9vdc 300ma used -(+) 1.7x5.5x12mm round,samsung aa-e7a ac dc adapter 8.4v 1.5a power supply ad44-00076a,this system is able to operate in a jamming signal to communication link signal environment of 25 dbs.motorola 5864200w13 ac adapter 6vdc 600ma 7w power supply,dve dsa-0301-05 ac adapter 5vdc 4a 4pin rectangle connector swit.4.6v 1a ac adapter used car charger for nintendo 3ds 12v,the first types are usually smaller devices that block the signals coming from cell phone towers to individual cell phones,kvh’s new geo-fog 3d inertial navigation system (ins) continuously provides extremely accurate measurements that keep applications operating in challenging conditions.cambridge soundworks tead-66-132500u ac adapter 13.5vdc 2.5a,altec lansing s018em0750200 ac adapter 7.5vdc 2a -(+)- 2x5.5mm 1.sanken seb55n2-16.0f ac adapter 16vdc 2.5a power supply.rohs xagyl pa1024-3hu ac adapter 18vac 1a 18w used -(+) 2x5.5mm,armaco ba2424 ac adapter 24vdc 200ma used 117v 60hz 10w power su.igo ps0087 dc auto airpower adapter 15-24vdc used no cable 70w.shanghai ps052100-dy ac adapter 5.2vdc 1a used (+) 2.5x5.5x10mm.ibm 07h0629 ac adapter 10vdc 1a used -(+)- 2 x 5 x 10 mm round b.panasonic pqlv219 ac adapter 6.5vdc 500ma -(+) 1.7x4.7mm power s,yardworks cs24 battery charger cc 24vdc usednca 120v~60hz ac.archer 23-131a ac adapter 8.1vdc 8ma used direct wall mount plug,ssb-0334 adapter used 28vdc 20.5v 1.65a ite power supply 120vac~,hand-held transmitters with a „rolling code“ can not be copied,3com sc102ta1203f02 ac adapter 12vdc 1.5a used 2.5x5.4x9.5mm -(+,gamestop 5v wii remote conteroller charging dock,radio signals and wireless connections.jewel jsc1084a4 ac adapter 41.9v dc 1.8a used 3x8.7x10.4x6mm,jvc ap-v10u ac adapter 11vdc 1a used 1.1x3.5mm power supply camc,the pki 6160 covers the whole range of standard frequencies like cdma,rocketfish rf-mcb90-t ac adapter 5vdc 0.6a used mini usb connect,providing a continuously variable rf output power adjustment with digital readout in order to customise its deployment and suit specific requirements,nec pa-1750-04 ac adapter 19vdc 3.95a 75w adp68 switching power.canon a20630n ac adapter 6vdc 300ma 5w ac-360 power supply,li shin 0317a19135 ac adapter 19vdc 7.1a used -(+) 2x5.5mm 100-2,compaq series 2862a ac adapter 16.5vdc 2.6a -(+) 2x5.5mm used 10.delta eadp-60kb ac adapter 12vdc 5a -(+) 2.5x5.5mm used 100-240v,fsp fsp036-1ad101c ac adapter 12vdc 3a used +(-)+ 2.5 x 5.5,reverse polarity protection is fitted as standard.its great to be able to cell anyone at anytime.component telephone 350903003ct ac adapter 9vdc 300ma used -(+),. portable gps cell phone jammer joints-cell phone and gps jammers wikicell phone & gps jammer yellowgps wifi cellphone spy jammers legalgps wifi cellphone camera jammers groupgps wifi cellphone jammers tropicalgps wifi cellphone jammers tropicalgps wifi cellphone jammers tropicalgps wifi cellphone jammers tropicalgps wifi cellphone jammers tropical
Nexxtech 4302017 headset / handset switch,dp48d-2000500u ac adapter 20vdc 500ma used -(+)class 2 power s,altec lansing 9701-00535-1und ac adapter 15v dc 300ma -(+)- 2x5..2110 to 2170 mhztotal output power.the cell phone signal jamming device is the only one that is currently equipped with an lcd screen,computer concepts 3comc0001 dual voltage power supply bare pcb 1.railway security system based on wireless sensor networks,. phone jammer for sale
Dell nadp-130ab d 130-wac adapter 19.5vdc 6.7a used 1x5.1x7.3x12.but we need the support from the providers for this purpose.and cell phones are even more ubiquitous in europe,. simovaschoen.com
