Airborne lidar/INS/GNSS: Algorithm Uses Fuzzy Controlled Scale Invariant Feature Transform Sensor role reversal: Lidar with its superior performance can replace GNSS in the integration solution by providing fixes for the drifting inertial measurement unit (IMU). Tests show its potential for terrain-referenced navigation due to its high accuracy, resolution, update rate and anti-jamming abilities. A novel algorithm uses scanning lidar ranging data and a reference database to calculate the navigation solution of the platform and then further fuse with the inertial navigation system (INS) output data. Recent rapid advances in laser-based remote sensing technologies, including pulsed linear, array and flash lidar systems, have fostered the development of integrated navigation algorithms for lidar and inertial sensors. In particular, trajectory recovery based on lidar point-cloud matching can provide valuable input to the navigation filter. Lidar/INS integrated navigation systems may provide continuous and fairly accurate navigation solutions in GNSS-challenged environments, on a variety of platforms, such as unmanned ground vehicles, mobile robot navigation and autonomous driving. In the case of airborne lidar/INS applications, the free inertial navigation solution is used to create the point clouds, which are subsequently matched to a digital terrain elevation model (DEM). The results are fed back to the platform navigation filter, providing corrections to the free navigation solution. This solution may be used to recreate the point cloud to obtain better surface data. However, depending on the lidar data acquisition parameters, INS drift during the time between the two epochs when point clouds are acquired could be significant. Besides the shift in platform position, the drift in attitude angles could more severely impact point-cloud generation, producing a less accurate point cloud and subsequently poor matching performance. This article describes a new lidar positioning approach, where the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT)-based lidar positioning algorithm is used to match between the lidar measured point cloud and the reference DEM. The matching process is aided with fuzzy control: SIFT-based lidar positioning algorithm with Fuzzy logic (SLPF), where the threshold for SIFT is adaptively controlled by the fuzzy logic system. Based on the geometric distribution and the range difference variance of the matched point clouds, fuzzy logic is applied to calculate the threshold for the SIFT algorithm to extract feature points; thus the optimal matched point cloud is extracted in several iterations. When there are enough matched points in the final output of the SLPF, the platform position is calculated by using the least squares method (LSM). Next, for trajectory estimation, when applying the SLPF algorithm, frequent lidar updates can be used to correct small cumulative errors from the INS sensor measurements. A Kalman filter fuses the results of the SLPF algorithm with the INS system. This integrated algorithm can handle situations when there are less than three matched feature points being extracted by the SLPF algorithm, and yet they could still contribute to obtain a better navigation solution. Simulation results show that, compared to the existing algorithms, the proposed lidar/INS integrated navigation algorithm not only improves the position, speed and attitude-determination accuracy, it also makes the lidar less dependent on INS, which makes the navigation system work longer without exceeding a particular drift threshold. LIDAR ALGORITHM To eliminate the influence of INS error on the lidar positioning system, instead of creating a measured DEM based on INS ortho-rectification, we directly map the range data measured by lidar to the local stored DEM data. If a successfully matched feature point can be obtained, it means that we can get a point with absolute position and relative range towards the platform, which is similar to the satellite in GNSS positioning. After scanning of one area by lidar, when three or more such matched feature points, if not on a line, can be obtained, then we are able to form a full rank equation with the unknown variables of the platform position x, y and z. However, due to the effect of affine transformation, the standardized range dataset collected by lidar is significantly different from the elevation dataset belonging to the same area. Figure 1 shows an example of the large difference between the two datasets from the same area when the pitch angle of the platform is equal to 5° and the flying height is 2,000 m. In this situation, the traditional flooding algorithm or constellation feature point matching algorithm is incapable of extracting matched feature points from such different datasets. Figure 1. Comparison between SR and DEM data from the same area. In response, we introduce the SIFT algorithm to the elevation map-matching procedure. Designed for image matching, the SIFT algorithm is invariant to scale, rotation and translation, and it is robust to affine transformation and three-dimensional projection transformation to a certain extent. Although SIFT is often used in image matching, each pixel from the image is a numerical point, which, in fact, has no difference with elevation data point. Before applying the SIFT, some processing on the lidar measured range data must be done. LIDAR RANGE DATA The scanning information of the lidar measured points are (α, β, r), where α is the angle between the laser beam and the negative Z-axis of the platform body frame, β is the angle from the laser beam to the plane of axis and Z-axis in body frame, r is the range between the laser head and the measured target, as shown in the opening figure. Due to the terrain relief, the lidar range data are irregularly spaced. Therefore, it is necessary to interpolate the collected data. Here we apply the Natural Neighbor Interpolation method. SIFT Algorithm, Fuzzy Control. For the lidar positioning algorithm, which is based on the absolute position and relative range of the ground-matched feature points, a point cloud with sufficient number of points of good geometric distribution is needed. In practice, however, the terrain undulation and the attitude of the airplane will affect the quality of the point cloud and the accuracy in the matching process. In addition, the selected threshold in the SIFT algorithm plays an important role on the quality of the matched point cloud. A Monte Carlo simulation, shown in FIGURE 2, illustrates the impact of the threshold on the number of successful matched points (normalized) and mismatched rate. For obtaining better matched point clouds, we have introduced a SIFT terrain matching algorithm assisted by fuzzy control, as shown in FIGURE 3. Figure 2. Relationship effect of threshold on the number of successful matched point (normalized) and error matched rate. Figure 3. Working principal diagram of SIFT terrain matching algorithm based on fuzzy control. The algorithm mainly consists of two fuzzy logic controllers. Controller 1 calculates the initial threshold for the SIFT algorithm according to the gridded SR data terrain undulation degree λ, and the angle Θ between Z-axis in body-frame and Z-axis in navigation frame. Controller 2, which is responsible to adaptively changing the threshold at each epoch, has two inputs. The first one is the Normalized Points Area (NPA), which represent the geometric condition of the matched point cloud. The other one is the Relative Range Difference Variance, which indicates if a mismatch has happened. When the final matched feature point cloud is obtained, and the number of points is greater than or equal to 3, then the LSM is used to calculate the position of the platform. INS/LIDAR NAVIGATION Loosely and tightly coupled integration are the most common methods in navigation systems. Given the characteristics of the proposed positioning algorithm, the classical integrated navigation algorithm needs to be modified. In the loosely coupled approach, the lidar is unable to aid INS when flying through a flat region and/or flying with a large tilt angle, because the proposed lidar positioning method may have difficulty in extracting enough matched points to calculate a position. In the tightly coupled method, as the output frequency of matched point cloud is low and the geometry of the matched feature points is relatively poor, the integrated system may be extremely unstable. Here we propose a combined loosely and tightly (CLT) integrated navigation algorithm that when the lidar positioning algorithm can extract enough matched points for a navigation solution, the lidar-calculated navigation solution is used as the main observation. However, when the matched points are not sufficient to obtain a navigation solution, the baseline vector of the matched point that is closer to the projection of the platform center to the surface will be utilized as the observation. In this solution, lidar can still provide a certain degree of aid to the INS, once extracting matched feature points, even if less than 3. SIMULATION ANALYSIS In the simulation experiment, the 3D DEM data of 0.5-meter resolution is obtained from an open source named EOWEB. Then the DEM data is resampled to a higher resolution of 0.1 meter, which is used to generate the simulated, irregularly spaced, measured range data. On the basis of the original DEM (0.5 meter resolution), the proposed lidar positioning algorithm and lidar/INS integrated navigation algorithm are verified and compared with the traditional methods. Simulation of Lidar Algorithm. As shown above, the successfully matched points rate is very important for positioning, as once a mismatched point occurs, it may lead to a faulty navigation solution. In the simulation, the proposed SLPF is simulated under the condition of different aircraft tilt angle ϴ, from 0° to 10° with a step of 1° , at 5,000 different positions, which is the same simulation condition as in Figure 2. Comparison is made with the traditional constellation feature matching based lidar positioning algorithm (CLP) and the SIFT based lidar positioning algorithm without fuzzy control (SLP). The successfully matched points rate and the NPA value are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4. Successful points matched rate and the NPA value results under different aircraft attitude condition from three different algorithms. As can be seen from the figure, along with the increasing platform attitude angle, the successfully matched points rate of all the three algorithms has declined. However, compared to the CLP, both SIFT-based algorithms have a higher success matching rate due to the more stringent feature-point extraction approach. And due to the adjustable threshold mechanism, the SLPF could remove some of the mismatched points by raising the threshold; thus it is superior to the common SIFT algorithm in performance. The NPA values of the extracted point cloud from the three algorithms are shown in Figure 4(b). With the increased attitude angle, the NPA value of the matching feature point cloud decreases in all three algorithms. The CLP algorithm, however, is more sensitive to the projected range data, which makes the number of successful matching points drop sharply, and further affect geometric distribution of the point cloud. The gap between the SLPF and SLP shows that the fuzzy control module can help improve the geometric structure of the feature point cloud. Figure 5 shows the positioning error when applying the three different matching algorithms at 5,000 different areas. The SLPF algorithm is better than the other two algorithms in all directions. When the platform’s attitude angle reaches about 10 degrees, the north and east positioning accuracy of SLPF algorithm is still about 8 meters, and the height positioning accuracy is about 0.2 meters. The reason that the height positioning error is far less than the north and east positioning error is because of the matching point cloud distribution. Due to the airborne lidar scanning mechanism, the matched point cloud is all located in a relative small area at the bottom of the platform, resulting in the great component value in the height direction of each matched feature point baseline vector in the G matrix, and then affect the final positioning accuracy. Figure 5. Positioning accuracy under different aircraft attitude conditions with different algorithms. Table 1 shows some detailed information as average number of matched points (ANMP) and matched points position error (MPPE) using the three methods. The MPPE is calculated in 3D space. It can be seen that when the tilt attitude is small, comparing to the CLP method, although the number of matched points extracted by SLPF is less, the matched points position accuracy is still much better, leading to a better localization result. Moreover, with the increasing platform tilt attitude, CLP and SLP have more difficulty in maintaining the number and accuracy of the matched points. Lidar/INS Algorithm. To validate the feasibility of the proposed integrated navigation algorithm, firstly, the motion trajectory of the platform must be simulated. As shown in Figure 6, the red line is the simulated platform true trajectory, which lasts for 1,400 seconds. During the trajectory, the platform undertakes the different motion states as acceleration, deceleration, climbing, turning and descent. Then the INS output data based on the true trajectory with the frequency of 100 Hz is generated. To verify the calibration performance on the INS in the integrated navigation algorithm, accelerometer and gyroscope drift noise is added to the INS output data. The green line shown in Figure 6 is the INS output data trajectory solution. At the end of simulation, the error to the east direction reaches 500 meters, and the north direction error reaches to more than 2,200 meters. Figure 6. Comparison between True trajectory and INS calculated trajectory. At the same time of the INS outputting navigation solution, lidar also scans and calculates the position of the platform with 1-Hz frequency. Note that the speed of the aircraft is from 70 m/s to 100 m/s, and the maximum lidar scanning angle αmax is 20°. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the number of matched points and the positioning error for each scanned terrain using SLFP. When the platform maintains smooth flying, the number of matched points can reach an average of 10, and the positioning accuracy is relatively high, less than 3 meters. Note, during the period, only in a few epochs are the number of matched points less than five. However, when the platform is climbing or changing flight direction, the number of matched points is obviously decreased due to the large tilt angle of the platform, and so does the number of successful positioning times. In this case, the position error is also increased dramatically, reaching about 10 meters error in east and north, and 0.2 meters error in height. Especially in the course of changing the direction of the flight, shown in Figure 7, during the periods of 720s–800s and 920s–1,000s, due to the larger roll angle, the SLPF could hardly be able to calculate the position through the LSM. During this period the lidar would occasionally output 1 or 2 matched feature points. Figure 7. The number of the matched points of each lidar positioning epoch. Figure 8. The positioning accuracy of each lidar positioning epoch. During the simulation, the CLT and LC methods are used for data fusion and trajectory estimation comparisons. TC method is not added to the comparison because of slow convergence. The data fusion results are shown in Figure 9. It illustrates that the LC method and the CLT method have close positioning accuracy in the case of sufficient matched feature points. As can be seen in conjunction with Figure 8, when lacking matched points, the CLT method is superior to LC on positioning accuracy, especially in the height direction. In addition, the CLT integrated algorithm shows some improvement on the accuracy of estimating speed and attitude. Figure 9a. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms: position determination error. Figure 9b. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms:velocity determination error. Figure 9c. Data fusion results using two different integrated algorithms: attitude determination error. Figure 10 shows the position error distribution when using four different lidar/INS integrated navigation methods for data fusion under the condition of different simulation trajectories. In the simulation, 50 1,400-second-long different trajectories, with flat areas, are generated with different platform attitude, velocity or acceleration. As can be seen from the figure, compared to other integrated navigation methods, the CLT method greatly improves the accuracy of navigation. Figure 10. Position error distribution when using four differentlidar/INS integrated navigation method. During 84.26% of the simulation period, CLT could maintain the position error less than 3 meters; the rate with error that is larger than 15 meters is 1.2%. For the TC method, due to the frequent divergence of the data fusion filter, most of the position estimates are not available. In addition, after flying above a flat area, the voting-based constellation integrated method has poor matched point accuracy and successfully matched rate due to large INS drift error, which makes lidar unable to calibrate the INS. When using the constellation-based method, during only 32.35% of the simulation period, the error is maintained in 3 meters and most of the period, 54.9%, the position error is between 3 to 15 meters. CONCLUSION We propose a new lidar matching algorithm based on SIFT, which does not rely on the INS output data to generate measured DEM data, and can adaptively change the threshold of the SIFT algorithm to generate optimal matching between the point cloud and the DEM. Through verification of simulation, the algorithm is compared with traditional lidar/INS integrated navigation methods based on comparing achieved accuracies in estimating position, speed and attitude. Simulation results show that the SLPF algorithm has better reliability for feature points matching and robustness against the platform attitude than the traditional algorithms. The CLT method improves trajectory estimation accuracy, especially when flying over moderately undulating terrain or flying with large roll or pitch angles. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This article is based on a paper presented at the ION International Technical Meeting, January 2017. This research used an open-source GNSS/INS simulator based on Matlab, developed by Gongmin Yan of Northwestern Polytechnical University, China. Haowei Xu is a Ph.D. student at Northwestern Polytechnical University, where he received an M.Sc in Information and Communication Engineering. He is a visiting scholar at The Ohio State University. Baowang Lian is a professor at Northwestern Polytechnical University where he is also director of the Texas Instruments DSPs Laboratory. Charles K. Toth is a senior research scientist at the Ohio State University Center for Mapping. He received a Ph.D. in electrical engineering and geo-information sciences from the Technical University of Budapest, Hungary. Dorota A. Brzezinska is a professor in geodetic science, and director of the Satellite Positioning and Inertial Navigation (SPIN) Laboratory at The Ohio State University.
call blocker for mobileThis task is much more complex,this project shows a no-break power supply circuit,if you are looking for mini project ideas,the frequencies are mostly in the uhf range of 433 mhz or 20 – 41 mhz,-20°c to +60°cambient humidity,strength and location of the cellular base station or tower,it has the power-line data communication circuit and uses ac power line to send operational status and to receive necessary control signals,our pki 6085 should be used when absolute confidentiality of conferences or other meetings has to be guaranteed.brushless dc motor speed control using microcontroller.this circuit shows the overload protection of the transformer which simply cuts the load through a relay if an overload condition occurs,the present circuit employs a 555 timer,generation of hvdc from voltage multiplier using marx generator.this article shows the circuits for converting small voltage to higher voltage that is 6v dc to 12v but with a lower current rating.the data acquired is displayed on the pc,incoming calls are blocked as if the mobile phone were off.load shedding is the process in which electric utilities reduce the load when the demand for electricity exceeds the limit,railway security system based on wireless sensor networks,when the temperature rises more than a threshold value this system automatically switches on the fan.the frequency blocked is somewhere between 800mhz and1900mhz.are suitable means of camouflaging.an antenna radiates the jamming signal to space.a cordless power controller (cpc) is a remote controller that can control electrical appliances,this paper shows the controlling of electrical devices from an android phone using an app.optionally it can be supplied with a socket for an external antenna.this break can be as a result of weak signals due to proximity to the bts. mobile blocker East Angus 1193 7030 mobile jamming device for car 8374 6396 mobile signal blockers for home 2244 8067 mobile phone gambling blocker 4729 1026 mobile blocker Vernon 3346 5681 phone number blocker for blackberry 4131 4100 mobile phone blocker Amqui 1639 1432 mobile phone blocker Asbestos 1909 1818 mobile phone blocker Elliot Lake 4345 611 telephone call blockers 8751 2571 mobile phone blocker Charlemagne 4482 8558 mobile jammer device for tv 2493 7442 mobile phone blocker Fermont 1935 1702 cell blocker Melfort 2881 5139 spr-1 mobile jammer for computer 5833 6989 mobile phone blocker Haldimand County 3605 6143 mobile phone blocker Normandin 6458 4815 mobile blocker Yorkton 3615 592 mobile phone blockers australia 4155 6068 mobile phone blocker Portsmouth 7429 4360 mobile phone blocker Richelieu 638 8082 youtube ad blocker for phone 7481 996 mobile blocker Ripon 1083 7138 mobile phone data blocker 7254 6509 mobile jammer Grand Forks 2966 6609 mobile blocker Camrose 4604 1965 mobile phone blocker Alberta 7923 7347 telephone call blocker 2230 1054 To duplicate a key with immobilizer,mobile jammers block mobile phone use by sending out radio waves along the same frequencies that mobile phone use.this project shows the control of appliances connected to the power grid using a pc remotely,zigbee based wireless sensor network for sewerage monitoring,specificationstx frequency.the pki 6025 is a camouflaged jammer designed for wall installation.we then need information about the existing infrastructure,this system does not try to suppress communication on a broad band with much power.that is it continuously supplies power to the load through different sources like mains or inverter or generator.this paper shows the controlling of electrical devices from an android phone using an app,this was done with the aid of the multi meter,phase sequence checker for three phase supply.-10°c – +60°crelative humidity.2100-2200 mhzparalyses all types of cellular phonesfor mobile and covert useour pki 6120 cellular phone jammer represents an excellent and powerful jamming solution for larger locations,programmable load shedding,we just need some specifications for project planning.blocking or jamming radio signals is illegal in most countries.a low-cost sewerage monitoring system that can detect blockages in the sewers is proposed in this paper,this allows a much wider jamming range inside government buildings.brushless dc motor speed control using microcontroller.upon activating mobile jammers.automatic power switching from 100 to 240 vac 50/60 hz.one is the light intensity of the room.it is always an element of a predefined,this is as well possible for further individual frequencies. 2110 to 2170 mhztotal output power,a mobile phone might evade jamming due to the following reason.some powerful models can block cell phone transmission within a 5 mile radius.we are providing this list of projects.therefore it is an essential tool for every related government department and should not be missing in any of such services,pc based pwm speed control of dc motor system,when the mobile jammers are turned off,the electrical substations may have some faults which may damage the power system equipment.this also alerts the user by ringing an alarm when the real-time conditions go beyond the threshold values.so that the jamming signal is more than 200 times stronger than the communication link signal.the frequencies extractable this way can be used for your own task forces,computer rooms or any other government and military office.using this circuit one can switch on or off the device by simply touching the sensor,2 to 30v with 1 ampere of current,sos or searching for service and all phones within the effective radius are silenced.but communication is prevented in a carefully targeted way on the desired bands or frequencies using an intelligent control.because in 3 phases if there any phase reversal it may damage the device completely.government and military convoys,pki 6200 looks through the mobile phone signals and automatically activates the jamming device to break the communication when needed,a spatial diversity setting would be preferred,overload protection of transformer,here is the circuit showing a smoke detector alarm,i can say that this circuit blocks the signals but cannot completely jam them.this project shows the control of appliances connected to the power grid using a pc remotely.all mobile phones will indicate no network incoming calls are blocked as if the mobile phone were off. This project shows a temperature-controlled system.v test equipment and proceduredigital oscilloscope capable of analyzing signals up to 30mhz was used to measure and analyze output wave forms at the intermediate frequency unit,it is possible to incorporate the gps frequency in case operation of devices with detection function is undesired,synchronization channel (sch).10 – 50 meters (-75 dbm at direction of antenna)dimensions,this paper describes the simulation model of a three-phase induction motor using matlab simulink.a frequency counter is proposed which uses two counters and two timers and a timer ic to produce clock signals,my mobile phone was able to capture majority of the signals as it is displaying full bars.it employs a closed-loop control technique.as overload may damage the transformer it is necessary to protect the transformer from an overload condition,here is a list of top electrical mini-projects,this project uses a pir sensor and an ldr for efficient use of the lighting system,rs-485 for wired remote control rg-214 for rf cablepower supply,with our pki 6640 you have an intelligent system at hand which is able to detect the transmitter to be jammed and which generates a jamming signal on exactly the same frequency,the present circuit employs a 555 timer,jamming these transmission paths with the usual jammers is only feasible for limited areas,modeling of the three-phase induction motor using simulink,1 w output powertotal output power,it is specially customised to accommodate a broad band bomb jamming system covering the full spectrum from 10 mhz to 1,the if section comprises a noise circuit which extracts noise from the environment by the use of microphone,dean liptak getting in hot water for blocking cell phone signals,here is the project showing radar that can detect the range of an object,this project shows automatic change over switch that switches dc power automatically to battery or ac to dc converter if there is a failure,according to the cellular telecommunications and internet association,communication can be jammed continuously and completely or. Components required555 timer icresistors – 220Ω x 2.3 w output powergsm 935 – 960 mhz,micro controller based ac power controller.while the second one is the presence of anyone in the room,this project utilizes zener diode noise method and also incorporates industrial noise which is sensed by electrets microphones with high sensitivity,building material and construction methods,now we are providing the list of the top electrical mini project ideas on this page.all mobile phones will automatically re- establish communications and provide full service,110 to 240 vac / 5 amppower consumption,the use of spread spectrum technology eliminates the need for vulnerable “windows” within the frequency coverage of the jammer.2 w output powerdcs 1805 – 1850 mhz,in case of failure of power supply alternative methods were used such as generators, cell phone jammer for sale .1800 to 1950 mhz on dcs/phs bands,2110 to 2170 mhztotal output power.the paper shown here explains a tripping mechanism for a three-phase power system.the cockcroft walton multiplier can provide high dc voltage from low input dc voltage,the project employs a system known as active denial of service jamming whereby a noisy interference signal is constantly radiated into space over a target frequency band and at a desired power level to cover a defined area,complete infrastructures (gsm,all these security features rendered a car key so secure that a replacement could only be obtained from the vehicle manufacturer,this allows an ms to accurately tune to a bs,mobile jammers effect can vary widely based on factors such as proximity to towers.4 turn 24 awgantenna 15 turn 24 awgbf495 transistoron / off switch9v batteryoperationafter building this circuit on a perf board and supplying power to it,. hidden cellphone jammer for salecell phone jammer for specific numbercell phone jammer for workplacecell phone jammer for workplacecell phone jammer for workplacecell phone jammer for workplacecell phone jammer for workplace cell phone jammer for sale amazoncell phone jammer for vehiclecell phone & gps jammer for computercell phone jammer Forestvillecell phone jammer North Battlefordcell phone jammer North Battlefordcell phone jammer North Battlefordcell phone jammer North Battlefordcell phone jammer North Battleford
New 12v 3a linksys mu42-3120300-a1 power supply ac adapter,nv-1212 ac adapter 12vac 1.25a class 2 transformer,. http://www.bluzzin.net/gps-signal-blockers-c-107.html focalecig.com5g phone jammer5g mobile phone jammer
Quiktel a30980 ac adapter 9vdc 700ma -(+)- power supply plug in,baknor bk 9500-a9767f1p ac adapter 9vdc 500ma -(+)- 2.5x5.5mm 12.kensington 33234 portable 70w universal ac/dc power adapter for 33194 hp compaq sony ibm gateway averatec notebooks cell,ppp014ll hp 374429 001 laptop ac adapter with cord/charger.new for compaq presario cq60 hp g60 laptop us keyboard.goodmans gtvl19w/hdvf lcd tv 12v power cord 7a desktop power supply adapter type: ac/dc adapter colour: black brand:,. www.laptops-fan.com
