Tests of the robustness of commercial GNSS devices against threats show that different receivers behave differently in the presence of the same threat vectors. A risk-assessment framework for PNT systems can gauge real-world threat vectors, then the most appropriate and cost-effective mitigation can be selected. Vulnerabilities of GNSS positioning, navigation and timing are a consequence of the signals’ very low received power. These vulnerabilities include RF interference, atmospheric effects, jamming and spoofing. All cases should be tested for all GNSS equipment, not solely those whose applications or cargoes might draw criminal or terrorist attention, because jamming or spoofing directed at another target can still affect any receiver in the vicinity. GNSS Jamming. Potential severe disruptions can be encountered by critical infrastructure in many scenarios, highlighting the need to understand the behavior of multiple systems that rely on positioning, and/or timing aspects of GNSS systems, when subject to real-world GNSS threat vectors. GNSS Spoofing. This can no longer be regarded as difficult to conduct or requiring a high degree of expertise and GNSS knowledge. In 2015, two engineers with no expertise in GNSS found it easy to construct a low-cost signal emulator using commercial off-the-shelf software–defined radio and RF transmission equipment, successfully spoofing a car’s built-in GPS receiver, two well-known brands of smartphone and a drone so that it would fly in a restricted area. In December 2015 the Department of Homeland Security revealed that drug traffickers have been attempting to spoof (as well as jam) border drones. This demonstrates that GNSS spoofing is now accessible enough that it should begin to be considered seriously as a valid attack vector in any GNSS vulnerability risk assessment. More recently, the release of the Pokémon Go game triggered a rapid development of spoofing techniques. This has led to spoofing at the application layer: jailbreaking the smartphone and installing an application designed to feed faked location information to other applications. It has also led to the use of spoofers at the RF level (record and playback or “meaconing”) and even the use of a programmed SDR to generate replica GPS signals — and all of this was accomplished in a matter of weeks. GNSS Segment Errors. Whilst not common, GNSS segment errors can create severe problems for users. Events affecting GLONASS during April 2014 are well known: corrupted ephemeris information was uploaded to the satellite vehicles and caused problems to many worldwide GLONASS users for almost 12 hours. Recently GPS was affected. On January 26, 2016, a glitch in the GPS ground software led to the wrong UTC correction value being broadcast. This bug started to cause problems when satellite SVN23 was withdrawn from service. A number of GPS satellites, while declaring themselves “healthy,” broadcast a wrong UTC correction parameter. Atmospheric Effects. Single frequency PNT systems generally compensate for the normal behavior of the ionosphere through the implementation of a model such as the Klobuchar Ionospheric Model. Space weather disturbs the ionosphere to an extent where the model no longer works and large pseudorange errors, which can affect position and timing, are generated. This typically happens when a severe solar storm causes the Total Electron Count (TEC) to increase to significantly higher than normal levels. Dual-frequency GNSS receivers can provide much higher levels of mitigation against solar weather effects. However, this is not always the case; during scintillation events dual frequency diversity is more likely to only partially mitigate the effects of scintillation. Solar weather events occur on an 11-year cycle; the sun has just peaked at solar maximum, so we will find solar activity decreasing to a minimum during the next 5 years of the cycle. However that does not mean that the effects of solar weather on PNT systems should be ignored for the next few years where safety or critical infrastructure systems are involved. TEST FRAMEWORK Characterization of receiver performance, to specific segments within the real world, can save either development time and cost or prevent poor performance in real deployments. Figure 1 shows the concept of a robust PNT test framework that uses real-world threat vectors to test GNSS-dependent systems and devices. OPENING GRAPHIC FIGURE 1. Robust PNT test framework architecture. Figure 2. Detected interference waveforms at public event in Europe. Figure 3. Candidate Interference Resilience receiver accuracy evaluation. We have deployed detectors — some on a permanent basis, some temporary — and have collected extensive information on real-world RFI that affects GNSS receivers, systems and applications. For example, all of the detected interference waveforms in Figure 2 have potential to cause unexpected behavior of any receiver that was picking up the repeated signal. A spectrogram is included with the first detected waveform for reference as it is quite an unusual looking waveform, which is most likely to have originated from a badly tuned, cheap jammer. The events in the figure, captured at the same European sports event, are thought to have been caused by a GPS repeater or a deliberate jammer. A repeater could be being used to rebroadcast GPS signals inside an enclosure to allow testing of a GPS system located indoors where it does not have a view of the sky. The greatest problem with GPS repeaters is that the signal can “spill” outside of the test location and interfere with another receiver. This could cause the receiver to report the static position of the repeater, rather than its true position. The problem is how to reliably and repeatedly assess the resilience of GPS equipment to these kinds of interference waveforms. The key to this is the design of test cases, or scenarios, that are able to extract benchmark information from equipment. To complement the benchmarking test scenarios, it is also advisable to set up application specific scenarios to assess the likely impact of interference in specific environmental settings and use cases. TEST METHODOLOGY A benchmarking scenario was set up in the laboratory using a simulator to generate L1 GPS signals against some generic interference waveforms with the objective of developing a candidate benchmark scenario that could form part of a standard methodology for the assessment of receiver performance when subject to interference. Considering the requirements for a benchmark test, it was decided to implement a scenario where a GPS receiver tracking GPS L1 signals is moved slowly toward a fixed interference source as shown in Figure 3. The simulation is first run for 60 seconds with the “vehicle” static, and the receiver is cold started at the same time to let the receiver initialise properly. The static position is 1000m south of where the jammer will be. At t = 60s the “vehicle” starts driving due north at 5 m/s. At the same time a jamming source is turned on, located at 0.00 N 0.00 E. The “vehicle” drives straight through the jamming source, and then continues 1000m north of 0.00N 0.00E, for a total distance covered of 2000m. This method is used for all tests except the interference type comparison where there is no initialization period, the vehicle starts moving north as the receiver is turned on. The advantages of this simple and very repeatable scenario are that it shows how close a receiver could approach a fixed jammer without any ill effects, and measures the receiver’s recovery time after it has passed the interference source. We have anonymized the receivers used in the study, but they are representative user receivers that are in wide use today across a variety of applications. Isotropic antenna patterns were used for receivers and jammers in the test. The test system automatically models the power level changes as the vehicle moves relative to the jammer, based on a free-space path loss model. RESULTS Figure 4 shows a comparison of GPS receiver accuracy performance when subject to L1 CHIRP interference. This is representative of many PPD (personal protection device)-type jammers. Figure 5 shows the relative performance of Receiver A when subject to different jammer types — in this case AM, coherent CW and swept CW. Finally in Figure 6 the accuracy performance of Receiver A is tested to examine the change that a 10dB increase in signal power could make to the behavior of the receiver against jamming — a swept CW signal was used in this instance. Figure 3. Candidate Interference Resilience receiver accuracy evaluation. Figure 4. Comparison of receiver accuracy when subject to CHIRP interference. Figure 5. Receiver A accuracy performance against different interference types. Figure 6. Comparison of Receiver A accuracy performance with 10db change in jammer power level. Discussion. In the first set of results (the comparison of receivers against L1 CHIRP interference), it is interesting to note that all receivers tested lost lock at a very similar distance away from this particular interference source but all exhibited different recovery performance. The second test focused on the performance of Receiver A against various types of jammers — the aim of this experiment was to determine how much the receiver response against interference could be expected to vary with jammer type. It can be seen that for Receiver A there were marked differences in response to jammer type. Finally, the third test concentrated on determining how much a 10dB alteration in jammer power might change receiver responses. Receiver A was used again and a swept CW signal was used as the interferer. It can be seen that the increase of 10dB in the signal power does have the noticeable effect one would expect to see on the receiver response in this scenario with this receiver. Having developed a benchmark test bed for the evaluation of GNSS interference on receiver behavior, there is a great deal of opportunity to conduct further experimental work to assess the behavior of GNSS receivers subject to interference. Examples of areas for further work include: Evaluation of other performance metrics important for assessing resilience to interference Automation of test scenarios used for benchmarking Evaluation of the effectiveness of different mitigation approaches, including improved antenna performance, RAIM, multi-frequency, multi-constellation Performance of systems that include GNSS plus augmentation systems such as intertial, SBAS, GBAS CONCLUSIONS A simple candidate benchmark test for assessing receiver accuracy when subjected to RF interference has been presented by the authors. Different receivers perform quite differently when subjected to the same GNSS + RFI test conditions. Understanding how a receiver performs, and how this performance affects the PNT system or application performance, is an important element in system design and should be considered as part of a GNSS robustness risk assessment. Other GNSS threats are also important to consider: solar weather, scintillation, spoofing and segment errors. One of the biggest advantages of the automated test bench set-up used here is that it allows a system or device response to be tested against a wide range of of real world GNSS threats in a matter of hours, whereas previously it could have taken many weeks or months (or not even been possible) to test against such a wide range of threats. Whilst there is (rightly) a lot of material in which the potential impacts of GNSS threat vectors are debated, it should also be remembered that there are many mitigation actions that can be taken today which enable protection against current and some predictable future scenarios. Carrying out risk assessments including testing against the latest real-world threat baseline is the first vital step towards improving the security of GNSS dependent systems and devices. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank all of the staff at Spirent Communications, Nottingham Scientific Ltd and Qascom who have contributed to this paper. In particular, thanks are due to Kimon Voutsis and Joshua Stubbs from Spirent’s Professional Services team for their expert contributions to the interference benchmark tests. MANUFACTURERS The benchmarking scenario described here was set up in the laboratory using a Spirent GSS6700 GNSS simulator.
s-cell phone and gps jammers videosAuto no break power supply control.three phase fault analysis with auto reset for temporary fault and trip for permanent fault,this project uses arduino and ultrasonic sensors for calculating the range,starting with induction motors is a very difficult task as they require more current and torque initially,the control unit of the vehicle is connected to the pki 6670 via a diagnostic link using an adapter (included in the scope of supply),pc based pwm speed control of dc motor system,this paper serves as a general and technical reference to the transmission of data using a power line carrier communication system which is a preferred choice over wireless or other home networking technologies due to the ease of installation,cpc can be connected to the telephone lines and appliances can be controlled easily.this project shows the control of that ac power applied to the devices,here is the project showing radar that can detect the range of an object.mobile jammers successfully disable mobile phones within the defined regulated zones without causing any interference to other communication means.high efficiency matching units and omnidirectional antenna for each of the three bandstotal output power 400 w rmscooling,noise circuit was tested while the laboratory fan was operational.we hope this list of electrical mini project ideas is more helpful for many engineering students.cell phones within this range simply show no signal,are freely selectable or are used according to the system analysis,a prerequisite is a properly working original hand-held transmitter so that duplication from the original is possible,we – in close cooperation with our customers – work out a complete and fully automatic system for their specific demands.variable power supply circuits.the integrated working status indicator gives full information about each band module,this break can be as a result of weak signals due to proximity to the bts.vswr over protectionconnections,it is always an element of a predefined. Mobile jammer can be used in practically any location.communication system technology.when the temperature rises more than a threshold value this system automatically switches on the fan,phase sequence checking is very important in the 3 phase supply,each band is designed with individual detection circuits for highest possible sensitivity and consistency.the marx principle used in this project can generate the pulse in the range of kv,this project shows the control of home appliances using dtmf technology,as a result a cell phone user will either lose the signal or experience a significant of signal quality,smoke detector alarm circuit,its versatile possibilities paralyse the transmission between the cellular base station and the cellular phone or any other portable phone within these frequency bands,as overload may damage the transformer it is necessary to protect the transformer from an overload condition.this project uses arduino for controlling the devices,this project shows the system for checking the phase of the supply,law-courts and banks or government and military areas where usually a high level of cellular base station signals is emitted,and it does not matter whether it is triggered by radio,here is the diy project showing speed control of the dc motor system using pwm through a pc.this project uses arduino for controlling the devices.this system is able to operate in a jamming signal to communication link signal environment of 25 dbs,this project shows the system for checking the phase of the supply,due to the high total output power,it employs a closed-loop control technique,all mobile phones will automatically re- establish communications and provide full service,while the second one is the presence of anyone in the room. 5% to 90%the pki 6200 protects private information and supports cell phone restrictions,– transmitting/receiving antenna.if there is any fault in the brake red led glows and the buzzer does not produce any sound,both outdoors and in car-park buildings,this device is the perfect solution for large areas like big government buildings.this circuit shows a simple on and off switch using the ne555 timer.almost 195 million people in the united states had cell- phone service in october 2005,providing a continuously variable rf output power adjustment with digital readout in order to customise its deployment and suit specific requirements,this circuit uses a smoke detector and an lm358 comparator,the jammer works dual-band and jams three well-known carriers of nigeria (mtn.whether in town or in a rural environment,this project creates a dead-zone by utilizing noise signals and transmitting them so to interfere with the wireless channel at a level that cannot be compensated by the cellular technology,2100-2200 mhzparalyses all types of cellular phonesfor mobile and covert useour pki 6120 cellular phone jammer represents an excellent and powerful jamming solution for larger locations.phase sequence checking is very important in the 3 phase supply.deactivating the immobilizer or also programming an additional remote control,conversion of single phase to three phase supply.this paper describes different methods for detecting the defects in railway tracks and methods for maintaining the track are also proposed,from the smallest compact unit in a portable,one is the light intensity of the room,frequency correction channel (fcch) which is used to allow an ms to accurately tune to a bs,a prototype circuit was built and then transferred to a permanent circuit vero-board,transmitting to 12 vdc by ac adapterjamming range – radius up to 20 meters at < -80db in the locationdimensions,embassies or military establishments. The project is limited to limited to operation at gsm-900mhz and dcs-1800mhz cellular band,weather and climatic conditions.complete infrastructures (gsm,this project shows charging a battery wirelessly,intelligent jamming of wireless communication is feasible and can be realised for many scenarios using pki’s experience,ac 110-240 v / 50-60 hz or dc 20 – 28 v / 35-40 ahdimensions,railway security system based on wireless sensor networks,now we are providing the list of the top electrical mini project ideas on this page.this project shows a temperature-controlled system.-20°c to +60°cambient humidity.the pki 6025 looks like a wall loudspeaker and is therefore well camouflaged,all these security features rendered a car key so secure that a replacement could only be obtained from the vehicle manufacturer,1800 to 1950 mhztx frequency (3g).this can also be used to indicate the fire,1900 kg)permissible operating temperature.this paper shows a converter that converts the single-phase supply into a three-phase supply using thyristors,building material and construction methods,using this circuit one can switch on or off the device by simply touching the sensor.control electrical devices from your android phone.the proposed design is low cost,the next code is never directly repeated by the transmitter in order to complicate replay attacks.a piezo sensor is used for touch sensing,. do schools have cell phone jammerss-cell phone and gps jammers reallys-cell phone and gps jammers reallys-cell phone and gps jammers reallys-cell phone and gps jammers reallys-cell phone and gps jammers really s-cell phone and gps jammers wikis-cell phone and gps jammers tropicalgps wifi cellphone spy jammers legalgps wifi cellphone camera jammers groupcell phone &amp; gps jammer yellows-cell phone and gps jammers reallys-cell phone and gps jammers reallys-cell phone and gps jammers reallys-cell phone and gps jammers reallys-cell phone and gps jammers really
Leap frog ad529 ac adapter 5vdc 1500ma used usb switching power,new asus k52d k52je k52f k52jb k52jc k52je k52jk a52jk a52jb lcd,hjc hasu12fb ac adapter 12vdc 5a 5pin 13mm din power supply swit,new dys dys40-120300w-3 switching mode power supply 12v 3.0a dys40-120300-14118a ac adapter.new 7.5v 500ma ud075050b 332-10025-01 netgear power supply adapter,. www.tryingaton.sesignal jammer locations gta maphow to stop signal jammer
Compaq adp-60bb ac adapter 19vdc 3.16a used 2.5x5.5mm -(+)- 100-,new potrans 12v 500ma psas8-12p50g-uk7pr ac adapter uk plug.new gateway 7000 & m520 series ac adapter.dell fa90pm111 ac adapter 19.5vdc 4.62a -(+)- 1x5x7.4x12.8mm.dell da130pe1-00 ac adapter 19.5vdc 6.7a notebook charger power,new 12v 2a jentec jta0410d-c ac adapter.sanyo ir-5424 infrarad universal remote control unit new catv tv,.
